Principles: Falsification of Ancient African History

Context

The centerpiece of the ideology of the independent genius of the White race, White "Western Civilization," and white supremacy is that the development of (1) prehistoric hominid life (AA,HH,HE,HSN,HSS), (2) modern homo sapiens sapiens, (3) the intellectualization of homo sapiens sapiens, (4) the first class-based advanced forms of ancient society, civilization, (5) the most advanced forms of classical ancient society---all had to start with Europeans according to the mainstream White educational structure. This is a standard operating procedure, even though there is no significant material evidence to prove any of it. Every university down to K-12 forces Black students to digest this fraud as a part of their intellectual diet, standardized test requirements, and belief system.

Their propaganda ends up as an inverted falsification of world history: whites who were last in civilization and applied science and engineering made first; Black populations who were first in civilization, applied engineering, logic, science, medicine, architecture, morality and ethics, national government, writing, etc., are made out to be last in every thing---and innately inferior.

The facts are:

More than 200,000 years ago, beings morphologically identical with humans of today were living in the region of the great Lakes at the sources of the Nile and nowhere else. The whole human race had its origin, just as the ancients had guessed, at the foot of the Mountains of the Moon, Mt. Kilimanjaro.
It was from this place that men and women moved out to people the rest of the world. The images of men of the protohistoric and even of the dynastic period in no way square with the idea of the KMTian race popular with Western anthropologists. Wherever the autochthonous racial type is represented with any degree of clearness, it is evidently African (Black). There are two variants of the black race: (a) straight-haired, represented in Asia by the Dravidians and in Africa by the Nubians and the Tubbou or Tedda, all three with jet-black skins; (b) the kinky-haired blacks of the Equatorial regions. Both types entered into the composition of the KMTian population. From the Upper Palaeolithic to the dynastic epoch, the whole of the river's basin was taken over progressively by these African (Black) peoples.
Present-day African peoples are in no way invaders come from another continent; they are the aborigines. Recent scientific discoveries that show Africa to be the cradle of humanity increasingly negate the hypothesis of this continent being peopled by outlanders. From the appearance of homosapiens--from earliest pre-history until our time--we are able to trace our origins as a people without significant breaks in continuity. In early prehistory, a great South-North movement brought the African peoples of the Great Lakes region into the Nile Basin. They lived there in clusters for ·millennia. These first Black civilizations were the first civilizations in the world, the development of Europe having been held [back by the last Ice Age, a matter of a hundred thousand years. The triumph of the monogenetic thesis of humanity, even at the stage of "Homo sapiens-sapiens," compels one to admit that all races descended from the Black race, according to filiation processes that science has explained. Until the fourth glacial epoch, African (Black)s were the only humans.
In sum, the first men and women were black, strongly pigmented, according to the proofs at his disposal, it was probably not until the fourth glaciation, which lasted 100,000 years, that the differentiation of the African (Black) race into distinct races occurred, following a long period of adaptation by the fraction isolated and imprisoned by the ice: narrowing of the nostrils, de-pigmentation of the skin and of the pupils of the eyes. There is continued agreement that Homo sapiens-modern men and women-appeared about 200,000 years ago, during the Upper Paleolithic. This first humanity, belonging to the lower layers of the Aurignacian, was probably related morphologically to the current Black type of humanity.

5. The first Homo sapiens was "African (Black)" and that the other races, white and yellow, appeared later, following differentiations (adaptations to different climates). Refusing to accept these facts, scholars substitute hypotheses for theory. The sole scientific conclusion conforming to the evidence is that the earliest humans, the very first Homo sapiens, were "African (Black)s" Obviously, the term negro is specious; in scientific writing, it belongs to that group of words used to gloss over the facts. Any African type that stands unquestionably at the origin of Civilization is, for that very reason, described by the most distinguished scholars as negro or Hamite. Clan organization based on the incest taboo marks the beginning of civilization.
6. The passage from clan to monolinguistic tribe or ethnic groups to the nation or nationality is a consequence of the exogamy of the clan. Humankind's prohibition against incest marks a starting point toward civilization. Since endogamy of the clan is prohibited, several neighboring clans established marriage arrangements which became over time kinship ties through alliance. Several clan groups began to share language and culture and develop into ethnic groups and nationality. The individual will even carry the clan name after detribalization.
7. Only one direct method of absolute dating is in common use. Nitrogen in the upper atmosphere is bombarded by neutrons produced by cosmic radiation; this results in the formation of a known proportion of radioactive carbon which becomes incorporated in carbon dioxide. This is absorbed by vegetation and thence passes into animal tissues. When bones are buried the radioactive carbon (C 14) begins to decay at a known rate.
8. Measurements of the carbon 14 content of buried organic matter can be translated mathematically to give an estimate of the age of the specimen. In practice the method is limited to material less than 60-70,000 years old since above this age the amount of carbon 14 remaining is too small to estimate. Another radiometric method (the potassium-argon technique) depends on the fact that naturally occurring potassium contains a radioactive isotope; this isotope decays at a constant rate producing argon which is held within the crystals of some Potassic minerals.
9. Estimates of the argon content of a sample of these minerals, derived from a deposit containing fossil bones, will directly measure the age of the bones

For students of world studies through African eyes, the edifice of contemporary civilizations has its origins in the rain forests, deserts, and Nile rivers of African antiquity, over 7000 years ago. In fact, the Nile Valley River system, which runs through the heart of the African continent, is at the heart---the center---of (1) the human species in all of its stages dating from 5,500,000 years ago; (2) the first settled human class societies, dating from 10,000 years ago; (3) and the first ancient advanced civilizations, dating from 7000 years ago. Ancient KMT has played the same role in relations to African culture and civilization that the Greco-Roman civilization has played in relationship to western and Eastern Europe.

The facts are:

KMT was an indigenous African ethnic and cultural cluster of civilizations, geographically situated along the 4,144-mile Nile River, which flowed from the interior of the African continent to the delta region of North Africa.
At the center of Africa's ancient moral, cosmological, scientific, methodological, and theoretical being is KMT. Ancient KMT was an African civilization. The history of Black Africa will remain suspended in air and cannot be written correctly until African historians dare connect it with the history of KMT.
In particular, the study of languages, institutions, and so forth, cannot be treated properly; in a word, it will be impossible to build African humanities, a body of African human sciences, so long as that relationship does not appear legitimate. The African historian who evades the problem of KMT is neither modest nor objective, nor unruffled; he/she is ignorant, cowardly, and neurotic. Imagine, if you can, the uncomfortable position of a western historian who was to write the history of Europe without referring to Greco-Latin Antiquity and try to pass that off as a scientific approach.
To the Greek and Latin writers contemporary with the ancient KMTians the latter's physical classification posed no problems: the KMT were African, thick-lipped, kinky-haired and thin-legged; the unanimity of the authors evidence on a physical fact as salient as a people's race will be difficult to minimize or pass over.
The cursory review of the evidence of the ancient Greco- Latin writers on the KMT ' race shows that the extent of agreement between them is impressive and is an objective fact difficult to minimize or conceal, the two alternatives between which present-day KMT ology constantly oscillates... Being black from head to foot and having kinky hair is not enough to make a man a African ! This shows us the kind of specious argumentation to which KMT ology has had to resort since its birth as a science.
The structure of African royalty, with the king put to death, either really or symbolically, after a reign which varied in length but was in the region of eight years, recall the ceremony of the Pharaoh's regeneration through the feast. Also, reminiscent of KMT are the circumcision rites mentioned earlier and the Totemism, cosmogonies, architecture, musical instruments, etc., of Africa. KMT ian antiquity is to African culture what Greco-Roman antiquity is to Western culture. The building up of a corpus of African humanities should be based on this fact.
This study makes it necessary to rewrite world history from a more scientific standpoint, taking into account the African -African component which was for a long time preponderant. It means that it is now possible to build up a corpus of African -African humanities resting on a sound historical basis instead of being suspended in mid-air. Finally, if it is true that only truth is revolutionary, it may be added that only rapprochement brought about on a basis of truth over the fact.
The rediscovery of the true past of the African peoples should not be a divisive factor but should contribute to uniting them, each and all, binding them together from the north to the south of the continent so as to enable them to carry out together a new historical mission for the greater good of mankind.
Beginning in the sixth century B.C. (525, when Cambyses occupied KMT) with the end of the independence of the great Black power base, the African peoples, until then drawn to the Nile Valley as by a magnet, fanned out over the continent. Perhaps they then came upon small pockets of populations descended from Paleolithic or Neolithic infiltrations. A few centuries later, around the first century, they founded the first of the continental civilizations in the West and South: Ghana, Nok-lfe, Zimbabwe and others.
After the drying up of the Sahara, which had been terminated by 7000 B.C., the primitive population must have migrated in part towards the valley of the Nile, where they met other groups coming probably from the Great Lakes. These people formed, for a long time, a sort of cluster along the valley; then because of over-population and invasion by others, they moved once again towards the heart of the continent, driving before them the Pygmies. This is what all the legends from the oral traditions of the present day Africans seem to confirm; and according to these legends, the ancestors of the African came from the East, from beside the "Great Water."
The distribution of Blacks on the African continent went through two principal phases. It is generally agreed that by 7000 B.C., the Sahara had dried up. Equatorial Africa was probably still a forest zone too dense to attract men. Consequently, the last Blacks who had lived in the Sahara now presumably left it to migrate toward the Upper Nile, with the possible exception of a few small isolated groups on the rest of the continent, who either had migrated toward the Upper Nile, with the possible exception of a few small isolated groups on the rest of the continent, who either had migrated toward the south or had headed north.
Perhaps the first group found an indigenous Black population in the region of the Upper Nile. Whatever the case, it was from the gradual adaptation to the new living conditions which nature assigned to these various Black populations that the oldest phenomenon of civilization came about. This civilization, called KMT in our period, developed for a long time in its early cradle; then it slowly descended the Nile Valley to spread out around the Mediterranean basin. This cycle of civilization, the longest in history, presumably lasted 10,000 years.

The foundations of the exact natural sciences were, therefore, first worked out by the Black Africans in KMT 2500 years before Greece, Rome, and later European and Arab metaphysicians invaded the North African region, seized the torch of scientific extradition along with millions of square miles of land, hundreds of millions of lives, and untold wealth in mineral resources, labor, and human intellectual thought matter stored up in ancient temples and libraries.

The initial analysis of the universe into its individual parts; the embryonic mastery of astrophysics, physics, chemistry, biology, psychology, anthropology, archaeology, geology, mathematics; the grouping of the different natural processes and objects in definite classes; the study of the internal anatomy of organized bodies in their manifold forms; the classification of populations of the world as were known; animal husbandry, urban planning, civil engineering, astrology, advanced architecture, law, family organization, government, federal organization of states and cities (nomes), their stages of development---these are the fundamental conditions of the gigantic strides that ancient KMT had made before the destructive invasions tore the heart of African civilization, culture, and intellect from its initial centers along the Nile River.

The facts are:

The first scientifically verifiable calendar in the world was in use by 4236bc in ancient African KMT. It was a galactic calendar which was synchronized with the 1460 periodical rising of Sirius "B" binary star system, which means that ancient Africans in KMT had initiated this calendar by 5696bc along the Nile River in east-central Africa. Such a painstaking scientific discovery organized time and organized indigenous African civilization along the Nile. Time is such an essential element of human life; almost every single scientific conclusion must be methodologically situated in some time, space, and mass dimension.

It has been determined, in fact, by means of astronomical calculations of mathematical precision, that in 4236 B.C. a calendar was in use in KMT. KMT had acquired enough theoretical and practical scientific knowledge to invent a calendar whose periodicity was 1,460 years. This is the interval of time separating two heliacal risings of Sothis or Sirius: every 1,460 years Sirius and the Sun rise simultaneously in the latitude of Memphis.

This figure was fixed by calculation rather than by experiment, that is to say, by observation. It is difficult to imagine, in fact, that forty-eight generations would bequeath their observations of the heavens so that at the end of the stated period, at a precise dawning the forty-eight generation could prepare itself to witness the heliacal rising of Sothis. This would also assume the existence of written astronomical archives, of precise chronology at a period considered as prehistoric.

The beginnings of indigenous African systems of thought date from Pharaonic times with the production of the African KMT Memphite (Wa-Set) Philosophy (4,236bc), which was the earliest systematic moral code establishing right and wrong, and good and bad. In ancient African morality, ethics, and virtue, major emphasis was placed on an individual's conduct in life, treating it as the basis on which one will be judged in the next life. These principles organized social space and gave order to the social lives of Africans who settled along the 4,144-mile Nile River.

The roots of this uniquely African will to justice via science were, therefore, initiated in this period. The independent indigenous literary production, the philosophical tradition, the moral basis for this great African civilization stretches over 3500 years. Its content was dualistic, holistically integrating matter and spirit, science and morality, theology and cosmology.

Pyramids (the largest buildings in the world that have stood for over 6000 years in Africa's KMT) were not built by empty religious mysticism, but by scientifically skilled indigenous African architects, engineers and master urban planners---who at the same time adhered to advanced religious and moral codes of social conduct. Science and morality, therefore, were one unified and complementary cross-paralleled reality. One did not negate the other.

The "divine speech," MDW NTR, of Djehuti (KMT's personification of science), was intimately bonded with "divine righteous behavior," MAATI, or Maat (KMT's personification of truth, justice, and righteousness). This was truly a unity of opposites. The unique facet of the ethical portions of the systems presented is their introduction of a comprehensive system of thought for scientific thought and moral practical guidance and action invented at least 2000 years before Greek Civilization:

Pyramid Texts: 3300-2400bc, a corpus of 2217 formulae or paragraphs in modern editions; these formulae are enshrined on the inside walls 0 of the chambers of the queen/king chamber, 5th dynasty;
Teachings of Imhotep, advisor to king Djeoser; 3rd dynasty, around 2800bc;
Teachings of Hordjedef, second son of Khafu; 4th dynasty, circa. 2700bc.
Teachings of Kagemni, vizier of Snefrou; 4th dynasty, circa. 2650bc.
The Teachings of Ptahotep, vizier under the reign of Isis; 5th dynasty, c. 2600bc.
The ShabaKA Inscription (Memphite Theology), transmitted by the stele of ShabaKA, these are essays on philosophical theoretical reflection of Ptah's priests in his Memphis sanctuary;
Admonitions of a KMTian Sage (Prophesies), circa 2300bc Dialogues of a Desperate Person and His/Her Ba, circa 2280bc.
The Teachings for King MeriKAre, Attributed to king Kheti II; 10th dynasty, circa. 2250bc.
Songs of the Harpists, circa. 2200bc.
Teachings of the Asar, circa. 2050bc.
The Teachings of Amenewhat to his Son Sesostris, circa. 2000bc.
Strength of Skilled Trades, circa., 1900bc

Teachings of the Moscow Mathematical Papyrus, circa., 1850bc; Rhine Papyrus
The Sarcophagus Text circa., 1650bc;
Book of Coming Forth by Day and By Night, circa. 1590bc;
The Great Hymn to Aton, circa., l400bc;
The Wisdom of Ani, circa l300bc.
The Teachings of Amenempoe, circa. 1l00bc.

African KMT civilization was actually situated in an era period when science, philosophy, ethics, and religion were not yet departmentalized or separated from the mainstream of scientific thought. This form of thinking was not merely spiritual in nature---it was cosmological, it was all-embracing, it encompassed a system of thinking and living that not only embraced matters of faith, morality, honor, righteousness but also religion, philosophy, sociology, psychology, justice, and the natural sciences.

Science, therefore, was synthesized with spirituality, matter with antimatter, fact with myth. Historically, Western interpretations of KMTic thought has constantly bastardized any scientific theories or methods by labeling them as "religion" as opposed to philosophy, science, or theory.

They know that religion did not build the scientifically precise great building structures in African KMT---structures that are unmatched in size and splendor in the world. Even with such advanced KMTic scientific documents as (1) the Rhind Mathematical Papyrus, (2) Ebers Medical Papyrus, (3) Papyrus of Moscow, (4) Medical Papyrus Adwin Smith, (5) Berlin Papyrus, and (6) Demotic Papyrus Carlseberg 1 to 9, Western science continues to propagandize the fabrication that KMT never had science or advanced philosophy, even though some of these indigenous African documents are over 2000 years older than documents of lesser scientific extradition in Greece or Rome.

It is clear, however, that such a historical fraud could not continue if morally sound African scientists independently deciphered and published their own ancient indigenous documents. At present, only a minute few are capable of such necessary tasks.

The highest sciences as well as the highest moral standards were taught and applied in ancient African KMTic temples of higher learning. The continuity of the body of architecture, art, urban planned cities that has been left is evidence. The divine physicians, engineers, moral teachers, scribes, and architects, such as Imhotep, Djehuty, Maat, and Amenhotep, son of Hapu, describe their material works simultaneously with their moral works. One can logically conclude that respect for knowledge and spirituality, theory and practice, and matter and spirit was central to the training of students.

KMT intellectual material consists of the inscriptions engraved on the temples, monuments, stele and statues; the inscriptions in temples, pyramids, and tombs, and on sarcophagi; obelisks, papyrus, and stone pallets. The sphere of knowledge varied from the highest cosmology and philosophy, which was veiled under intricate symbology down to secular notes, letters, and elementary school exercises.

The form that this knowledge took varied from inscriptions on pyramids and steles; cosmological symbology, astronomical inscriptions, hymns and poems with moral meaning, philosophical narratives, historical records; legal documents, business and commerce documents, letters, governmental decrees and enactment's to codes of morality, ethics, and concessions of innocence. Also there were scientific papers that documented the following: mathematics, medicine and surgery, therapeutics, symbolic formulas, family morality, justice, ethics, and public manners.

If one considers, in addition to the inscriptions, the work that accompanies them---the architecture of temples as well as of pyramids, sculpture, statuary, the calculation and cutting of stone's in quarries, the working of minerals, and different alloys of metals---it would be impossible to relegate KMT's intellectual and scientific production to "religion." A thorough knowledge of mathematics, geometry, statistics, metallurgical chemistry, and geology was required for all these labors without taking into account that certain work, such as the calculation of the cubits for the various Nomes needed precise geometrical knowledge. Africans in KMT were practicing science and spirituality over 3000 years before Greeks and Romans had built their first city.

Every text and every picture comprised several aspects of the object reality, owing to the fact that in KMTian thought these aspects were never isolated from each other. Therefore, studying them separately would leave amputate the vital force, the unity and struggle of opposites, the "KA" (vital forces), the driving will of the process. Clearly, modern European assessment of KMT thought has distorted its essence, fragmented its universal meaning, bastardized its content and form of presentation.

The facts are:

The educational system of KMT was limited and suited to individual ability; it gave to each what was necessary to whet personal interest and faculty for working, but reserved the teaching of the inner temples. Only those who would go through a lifetime of initiations, those who would pay with their lives, those who were willing to undergo complete moral, mental, and material transformation could become the great sages in that day. There are great lessons to be learned From KMT's educational system by modern students of world studies through African eyes.
Flowing through this ancient system is a complex moral and philosophical system which flowered without the brutal intervention of either the monotheistic, intellectualized White God of Christian theology or the infiltrating "we come in peace" and "merciful" Allah of Muslim theology. In fact, African KMT developed quite efficiently for over 4000 years without a fully conscious divinely inspired messianism like that of the two religions earlier mentioned. This "God," this unmoved mover, this "absolute spirit," this "universal vital force" did not sleep before the advent of these two world religions but had influences in earlier epochs in ancient African history, inspiring high scientific and moral standards, codes of right and wrong, and confessions of innocence.
Later, this indigenous African moral "thought matter" was plagiarized and claimed by Hebrews during their 400-year sojourn in ancient African KMT. Moses, their first and chief lawmaker---taking the ancient African KMT's 42 Confessions of Innocence and making 10 Commandments--- was, according to the Old Testament, thoroughly instructed in the wisdom of ancient KMT. He was a KMTic priest. He lived the larger part of his early life in KMT. He was thoroughly educated in KMTic schools and temples.

4. Even KMTic religious theology expressed a certain systematic logic. Ancient African KMT viewed heaven as the seat of the Neters, that is to say, the "creative causes," the unmoved movers, the supreme will, the vital forces, or agents of continuous creation and the principles of functions, which through reflection into the earthly world maintained its existence. This is fluid duality personified. Temples were conceived of as the cosmic seats of the Neters, each a sacred place of dwelling for a significant moral or scientific principle to which each of them was dualistically dedicated.
5. The sanctuary of a KMTic temple, with its huge doors, vividly painted walls, massive pillars, chambers, corridors, and various sacred monuments surrounding it, was the secret part of the temple; its walls were covered with the most important texts, and it was separated from the "open temple" by the transitional hall. Clearly if KMT's intellectual and moral system had been applied to build the proper military system, African civilization would today be leading the world in the arts and the sciences. For historical and cultural reasons it was not. Material force must be met with superior material force as to ensure self-preservation. KMT was sorely deficient in this area.
6. In sum, the temple inscriptions are explicit on this point: science and morality are inseparable; therefore any subsequent research methodology must have Maati (moral correctness) and Djehuti (scientific precision) as its plan, driving force, and its goal. African scientists today must independently resurrect this ancient method of judging reality and fortify it with a material will that centers on self-preservation and self-development.
7. For students of world studies through African eyes---as opposed to starting the foundation of scientific inquiry in Greece, Rome, Mecca, or Mesopotamia---African scientists must accurately reconstruct science and scientific methods where science and scientific methods were first in practice. This is the only logical foundation on which to accurately order the historical development of science and scientific systems of thought and practice. There is also the necessity to organize instruction of science, scientific method, spirituality, morality, and will in view of the emerging African cultural and intellectual renaissance.
8. Accurate history of human practice from the beginning of humankind, rediscovered, purged of racial bias, and placed in the culturally liberating framework of the African scientist will serve as the starting point for reconstructing a uniquely scientific African worldview.
9. Indeed, cultural legacy is so important---so fundamental to the maintenance of civilization---that some groupings have made up their antiquity and have therefore built intellectual and moral houses of cards on shifting sands.

Africans have a real (but fractured) cultural relationship with ancient African KMT, but have wastefully failed to not unearth, redeem, resurrect or restore this fundamental necessity of life.

Why else do most Africans have White and Arab names, clothing, architecture, religions, family organization, governmental systems, holidays, calendars, education, philosophies, science, theory, method, hair styles, habits, beliefs rather than independently rooting their very existence on their great ancient KMTic foundation? Why else do most African thinkers waste whole careers trying to prove that Africans helped to build white and Arab civilizations (civilizations that ultimately invaded and destroyed indigenous African Civilizations) instead of focusing on the necessary redemption, resurrection, and rebuilding of African civilization using KMT as its foundation?

The question of Greek civilization, its "miraculous" achievement of the arts and the sciences in time frame, which is unprecedented in the annals of human history, is at the heart of the justification for White supremacy. Therefore, it is the single most important ideological basis for White racism. Nearly 500 years of intellectual careers went into evolving this antihistory. Rigorously, since as early as 1750bc, big names such as Friedreich August Wolf, Wilhelm von Humboldt, Hegel, Hume, Marx, De Gobineau, Barthold Niebuhr, Maspero, Breasted, Toynbee, all consciously or unconsciously had an early hand in furthering the misconception that everything, including African KMT , was a metaphysical mess until scientific Greece "miraculously" came along and created science, research methods, philosophy, mathematics, architecture, writing---everything of significance to world civilization.

The facts are:

More than 200,000 years ago, beings morphologically identical with humans of today were living in the region of the great Lakes at the sources of the Nile and nowhere else. The whole human race had its origin, just as the ancients had guessed, at the foot of the Mountains of the Moon, Mt. Kilimanjaro.
It was from this place that men and women moved out to people the rest of the world. The images of men of the protohistoric and even of the dynastic period in no way square with the idea of the KMTian race popular with Western anthropologists. Wherever the autochthonous racial type is represented with any degree of clearness, it is evidently African (Black). There are two variants of the black race: (a) straight-haired, represented in Asia by the Dravidians and in Africa by the Nubians and the Tubbou or Tedda, all three with jet-black skins; (b) the kinky-haired blacks of the Equatorial regions. Both types entered into the composition of the KMTian population. From the Upper Palaeolithic to the dynastic epoch, the whole of the river's basin was taken over progressively by these African (Black) peoples.
Present-day African peoples are in no way invaders come from another continent; they are the aborigines. Recent scientific discoveries that show Africa to be the cradle of humanity increasingly negate the hypothesis of this continent being peopled by outlanders. From the appearance of homosapiens--from earliest pre-history until our time--we are able to trace our origins as a people without significant breaks in continuity. In early prehistory, a great South-North movement brought the African peoples of the Great Lakes region into the Nile Basin. They lived there in clusters for ·millennia. These first Black civilizations were the first civilizations in the world, the development of Europe having been held [back by the last Ice Age, a matter of a hundred thousand years. The triumph of the monogenetic thesis of humanity, even at the stage of "Homo sapiens-sapiens," compels one to admit that all races descended from the Black race, according to filiation processes that science has explained. Until the fourth glacial epoch, African (Black)s were the only humans.
In sum, the first men and women were black, strongly pigmented, according to the proofs at his disposal, it was probably not until the fourth glaciation, which lasted 100,000 years, that the differentiation of the African (Black) race into distinct races occurred, following a long period of adaptation by the fraction isolated and imprisoned by the ice: narrowing of the nostrils, de-pigmentation of the skin and of the pupils of the eyes. There is continued agreement that Homo sapiens-modern men and women-appeared about 200,000 years ago, during the Upper Paleolithic. This first humanity, belonging to the lower layers of the Aurignacian, was probably related morphologically to the current Black type of humanity.

5. The first Homo sapiens was "African (Black)" and that the other races, white and yellow, appeared later, following differentiations (adaptations to different climates). Refusing to accept these facts, scholars substitute hypotheses for theory. The sole scientific conclusion conforming to the evidence is that the earliest humans, the very first Homo sapiens, were "African (Black)s" Obviously, the term negro is specious; in scientific writing, it belongs to that group of words used to gloss over the facts. Any African type that stands unquestionably at the origin of Civilization is, for that very reason, described by the most distinguished scholars as negro or Hamite. Clan organization based on the incest taboo marks the beginning of civilization.
6. The passage from clan to monolinguistic tribe or ethnic groups to the nation or nationality is a consequence of the exogamy of the clan. Humankind's prohibition against incest marks a starting point toward civilization. Since endogamy of the clan is prohibited, several neighboring clans established marriage arrangements which became over time kinship ties through alliance. Several clan groups began to share language and culture and develop into ethnic groups and nationality. The individual will even carry the clan name after detribalization.
7. Only one direct method of absolute dating is in common use. Nitrogen in the upper atmosphere is bombarded by neutrons produced by cosmic radiation; this results in the formation of a known proportion of radioactive carbon which becomes incorporated in carbon dioxide. This is absorbed by vegetation and thence passes into animal tissues. When bones are buried the radioactive carbon (C 14) begins to decay at a known rate.
8. Measurements of the carbon 14 content of buried organic matter can be translated mathematically to give an estimate of the age of the specimen. In practice the method is limited to material less than 60-70,000 years old since above this age the amount of carbon 14 remaining is too small to estimate. Another radiometric method (the potassium-argon technique) depends on the fact that naturally occurring potassium contains a radioactive isotope; this isotope decays at a constant rate producing argon which is held within the crystals of some Potassic minerals.
9. Estimates of the argon content of a sample of these minerals, derived from a deposit containing fossil bones, will directly measure the age of the bones

The facts are:

KMT was an indigenous African ethnic and cultural cluster of civilizations, geographically situated along the 4,144-mile Nile River, which flowed from the interior of the African continent to the delta region of North Africa.
At the center of Africa's ancient moral, cosmological, scientific, methodological, and theoretical being is KMT. Ancient KMT was an African civilization. The history of Black Africa will remain suspended in air and cannot be written correctly until African historians dare connect it with the history of KMT.
In particular, the study of languages, institutions, and so forth, cannot be treated properly; in a word, it will be impossible to build African humanities, a body of African human sciences, so long as that relationship does not appear legitimate. The African historian who evades the problem of KMT is neither modest nor objective, nor unruffled; he/she is ignorant, cowardly, and neurotic. Imagine, if you can, the uncomfortable position of a western historian who was to write the history of Europe without referring to Greco-Latin Antiquity and try to pass that off as a scientific approach.
To the Greek and Latin writers contemporary with the ancient KMTians the latter's physical classification posed no problems: the KMT were African, thick-lipped, kinky-haired and thin-legged; the unanimity of the authors evidence on a physical fact as salient as a people's race will be difficult to minimize or pass over.
The cursory review of the evidence of the ancient Greco- Latin writers on the KMT ' race shows that the extent of agreement between them is impressive and is an objective fact difficult to minimize or conceal, the two alternatives between which present-day KMT ology constantly oscillates... Being black from head to foot and having kinky hair is not enough to make a man a African ! This shows us the kind of specious argumentation to which KMT ology has had to resort since its birth as a science.
The structure of African royalty, with the king put to death, either really or symbolically, after a reign which varied in length but was in the region of eight years, recall the ceremony of the Pharaoh's regeneration through the feast. Also, reminiscent of KMT are the circumcision rites mentioned earlier and the Totemism, cosmogonies, architecture, musical instruments, etc., of Africa. KMT ian antiquity is to African culture what Greco-Roman antiquity is to Western culture. The building up of a corpus of African humanities should be based on this fact.
This study makes it necessary to rewrite world history from a more scientific standpoint, taking into account the African -African component which was for a long time preponderant. It means that it is now possible to build up a corpus of African -African humanities resting on a sound historical basis instead of being suspended in mid-air. Finally, if it is true that only truth is revolutionary, it may be added that only rapprochement brought about on a basis of truth over the fact.
The rediscovery of the true past of the African peoples should not be a divisive factor but should contribute to uniting them, each and all, binding them together from the north to the south of the continent so as to enable them to carry out together a new historical mission for the greater good of mankind.
Beginning in the sixth century B.C. (525, when Cambyses occupied KMT) with the end of the independence of the great Black power base, the African peoples, until then drawn to the Nile Valley as by a magnet, fanned out over the continent. Perhaps they then came upon small pockets of populations descended from Paleolithic or Neolithic infiltrations. A few centuries later, around the first century, they founded the first of the continental civilizations in the West and South: Ghana, Nok-lfe, Zimbabwe and others.
After the drying up of the Sahara, which had been terminated by 7000 B.C., the primitive population must have migrated in part towards the valley of the Nile, where they met other groups coming probably from the Great Lakes. These people formed, for a long time, a sort of cluster along the valley; then because of over-population and invasion by others, they moved once again towards the heart of the continent, driving before them the Pygmies. This is what all the legends from the oral traditions of the present day Africans seem to confirm; and according to these legends, the ancestors of the African came from the East, from beside the "Great Water."
The distribution of Blacks on the African continent went through two principal phases. It is generally agreed that by 7000 B.C., the Sahara had dried up. Equatorial Africa was probably still a forest zone too dense to attract men. Consequently, the last Blacks who had lived in the Sahara now presumably left it to migrate toward the Upper Nile, with the possible exception of a few small isolated groups on the rest of the continent, who either had migrated toward the Upper Nile, with the possible exception of a few small isolated groups on the rest of the continent, who either had migrated toward the south or had headed north.
Perhaps the first group found an indigenous Black population in the region of the Upper Nile. Whatever the case, it was from the gradual adaptation to the new living conditions which nature assigned to these various Black populations that the oldest phenomenon of civilization came about. This civilization, called KMT in our period, developed for a long time in its early cradle; then it slowly descended the Nile Valley to spread out around the Mediterranean basin. This cycle of civilization, the longest in history, presumably lasted 10,000 years.

The facts are:

Pyramid Texts: 3300-2400bc, a corpus of 2217 formulae or paragraphs in modern editions; these formulae are enshrined on the inside walls 0 of the chambers of the queen/king chamber, 5th dynasty;
Teachings of Imhotep, advisor to king Djeoser; 3rd dynasty, around 2800bc;
Teachings of Hordjedef, second son of Khafu; 4th dynasty, circa. 2700bc.
Teachings of Kagemni, vizier of Snefrou; 4th dynasty, circa. 2650bc.
The Teachings of Ptahotep, vizier under the reign of Isis; 5th dynasty, c. 2600bc.
The ShabaKA Inscription (Memphite Theology), transmitted by the stele of ShabaKA, these are essays on philosophical theoretical reflection of Ptah's priests in his Memphis sanctuary;
Admonitions of a KMTian Sage (Prophesies), circa 2300bc Dialogues of a Desperate Person and His/Her Ba, circa 2280bc.
The Teachings for King MeriKAre, Attributed to king Kheti II; 10th dynasty, circa. 2250bc.
Songs of the Harpists, circa. 2200bc.
Teachings of the Asar, circa. 2050bc.
The Teachings of Amenewhat to his Son Sesostris, circa. 2000bc.
Strength of Skilled Trades, circa., 1900bc

Teachings of the Moscow Mathematical Papyrus, circa., 1850bc; Rhine Papyrus
The Sarcophagus Text circa., 1650bc;
Book of Coming Forth by Day and By Night, circa. 1590bc;
The Great Hymn to Aton, circa., l400bc;
The Wisdom of Ani, circa l300bc.
The Teachings of Amenempoe, circa. 1l00bc.

The facts are:

The educational system of KMT was limited and suited to individual ability; it gave to each what was necessary to whet personal interest and faculty for working, but reserved the teaching of the inner temples. Only those who would go through a lifetime of initiations, those who would pay with their lives, those who were willing to undergo complete moral, mental, and material transformation could become the great sages in that day. There are great lessons to be learned From KMT's educational system by modern students of world studies through African eyes.
Flowing through this ancient system is a complex moral and philosophical system which flowered without the brutal intervention of either the monotheistic, intellectualized White God of Christian theology or the infiltrating "we come in peace" and "merciful" Allah of Muslim theology. In fact, African KMT developed quite efficiently for over 4000 years without a fully conscious divinely inspired messianism like that of the two religions earlier mentioned. This "God," this unmoved mover, this "absolute spirit," this "universal vital force" did not sleep before the advent of these two world religions but had influences in earlier epochs in ancient African history, inspiring high scientific and moral standards, codes of right and wrong, and confessions of innocence.
Later, this indigenous African moral "thought matter" was plagiarized and claimed by Hebrews during their 400-year sojourn in ancient African KMT. Moses, their first and chief lawmaker---taking the ancient African KMT's 42 Confessions of Innocence and making 10 Commandments--- was, according to the Old Testament, thoroughly instructed in the wisdom of ancient KMT. He was a KMTic priest. He lived the larger part of his early life in KMT. He was thoroughly educated in KMTic schools and temples.

4. Even KMTic religious theology expressed a certain systematic logic. Ancient African KMT viewed heaven as the seat of the Neters, that is to say, the "creative causes," the unmoved movers, the supreme will, the vital forces, or agents of continuous creation and the principles of functions, which through reflection into the earthly world maintained its existence. This is fluid duality personified. Temples were conceived of as the cosmic seats of the Neters, each a sacred place of dwelling for a significant moral or scientific principle to which each of them was dualistically dedicated.
5. The sanctuary of a KMTic temple, with its huge doors, vividly painted walls, massive pillars, chambers, corridors, and various sacred monuments surrounding it, was the secret part of the temple; its walls were covered with the most important texts, and it was separated from the "open temple" by the transitional hall. Clearly if KMT's intellectual and moral system had been applied to build the proper military system, African civilization would today be leading the world in the arts and the sciences. For historical and cultural reasons it was not. Material force must be met with superior material force as to ensure self-preservation. KMT was sorely deficient in this area.
6. In sum, the temple inscriptions are explicit on this point: science and morality are inseparable; therefore any subsequent research methodology must have Maati (moral correctness) and Djehuti (scientific precision) as its plan, driving force, and its goal. African scientists today must independently resurrect this ancient method of judging reality and fortify it with a material will that centers on self-preservation and self-development.
7. For students of world studies through African eyes---as opposed to starting the foundation of scientific inquiry in Greece, Rome, Mecca, or Mesopotamia---African scientists must accurately reconstruct science and scientific methods where science and scientific methods were first in practice. This is the only logical foundation on which to accurately order the historical development of science and scientific systems of thought and practice. There is also the necessity to organize instruction of science, scientific method, spirituality, morality, and will in view of the emerging African cultural and intellectual renaissance.
8. Accurate history of human practice from the beginning of humankind, rediscovered, purged of racial bias, and placed in the culturally liberating framework of the African scientist will serve as the starting point for reconstructing a uniquely scientific African worldview.
9. Indeed, cultural legacy is so important---so fundamental to the maintenance of civilization---that some groupings have made up their antiquity and have therefore built intellectual and moral houses of cards on shifting sands.

Africans have a real (but fractured) cultural relationship with ancient African KMT, but have wastefully failed to not unearth, redeem, resurrect or restore this fundamental necessity of life.

Ancient Greece did not have much of a history of scientific practice before its infiltration and later invasions into Northern Africa. But miraculously, Greece did have a long list of scientific publications and scientifically verified theories (compiled during its occupation of Northern Africa, i.e., in what they came to called Egypt, specifically at Alexandria 450 BC to 50 BC). This Aryan model of White supremacy via the so-called "Greece Miracle" later came to serve as a foundation for almost every scientific discipline developed by Europeans in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.

For verification of the level of existence decimated African cultures, societies, and populations had been reduced to, we refer to Georg Hegel's The Philosophy of History.^{^[1]} This book is long respected as a classic in European history and philosophy. In it, among other things, Hegel is describing Africans with his large vocabulary and the best classical and medieval knowledge that European White supremacy could afford a genius.

After having taken "civilized" black-skinned Egyptians (KMT) out of Africa (despite K.R Lepsius' fat tomes of color pictures of how Egyptians [KMTians] painted themselves "black" in comparison to the populations near them, in his Denkmaler aus Aegyptien und Aethiopien, Vol. III and IV., especially plate 48) and made them part of Asia, he begins his dissection of what is left of Africa. He isolates Africa's "Negroes," who incidentally look just like the indigenous Egyptians (KMT) of whom he had handed to Asians and the East. In this opening quote, Hegel contemplates the nature of the "Negro" as European anthropology; philosophy and religion had done and continues to do so, even in the 1990's:

The Negro, as already observed, exhibits the natural man in his completely wild and untamed state. We must lay aside all thought of reverence and morality---all that we call feeling---if we would rightly comprehend him; there is nothing harmonious with humanity to be found in this type of character.^{^[2]}

Later, he becomes a holy European socio-biologist:

Tyranny is regarded as no wrong, and cannibalism is looked upon as quite customary and proper. Among us instinct deters from it, if we can speak of instinct at all as appertaining to man. But with the Negro this is not the case, and the devouring of human flesh is altogether consonant with the general principles of the African race.^{^[3]}

Next, in his summary he shows off his psychoanalytic and sociological skills:

From these various traits it is manifest that want of self-control distinguishes the character of the Negroes. This condition is capable of no development or culture, and as we see them at this day, such have they always been.^{^[4]}

As he moves toward a close he fumes and works himself into a frenzy because he cannot understand why Africans (Negroes), are not thankful for the "gift" of enslavement that Europeans forced upon them. The decendents of hundreds of millions of innocent Africans who were literally murdered by Whites and and Arabs in the holocaust of African enslavement have every right to treat all who benefited from their suffering as enemies. Hegel does not agree.

The only essential connection that has existed and continued between the Negroes and the Europeans is that of slavery. In this the Negroes see nothing unbecoming them, and the English who have done most for abolishing the slave-trade and slavery, are treated by the Negroes themselves as enemies.^{^[5]}

Hegel oviously died before the 1884-1885 Berlin Conference in Germany at which time all of these white nations "who have done most for abolishing the slave-trade and slavery," carved up the African continenent for imperialist colonial mineral wealth and resources. England murderously siezed the most land from helpless African nations that they according to Hegel, "had done most for."

Finally, he closes his amateurish casebook on Africa, pronouncing it as dead from its beginning and forever more. Even though this logic violates his "dialectic" regarding self-motion, development and change, he pronounces Africa dead on arrival intellectually. Here, he begins his triumphant departure of Africa forever:

At this point we leave Africa, not to mention it again. For it is no historical part of the World; it has no movement or development to exhibit. Historical movements in it---that is in its northern part---belong to the Asiatic or European World...Egypt will be considered in reference to the passage of the human mind from Eastern to its Western phase, but it does not belong to the African Spirit.^{^[6]}

Now, Mr. Hegel was a composite of the very best minds in European history---a genius in many respects. He had summed up the legacy of Western philosophy and had developed an entire philosophical system. He was, and in many regards is even today, the intellectual quintessence of European thought regarding Africans. Thus, if he were an error, he was a composite error of the Western Civilization itself, which produced him. Hegel paved the way for White supremacy, and much less talented American historians followed.

Next to take up the mantle of distorting the historical record in support of White domination over Africans there was Gobineau in his two thick volumes of Oeuvres:

The black variety is the lowest and lies at the bottom of the ladder. The animal charter lent to its basic form imposes its destiny from the moment of conception. It never leaves the most restricted intellectual zone's... If its faculties for thinking are mediocre or even nonexistent, it possesses in its desire and as a consequence in its will an intensity that is often terrible. Many of the senses are developed with vigor unknown in the other two races: principally taste and smell. it is precisely in the greed for sensations that the most striking mark of its inferiority is found.^{^[7]}

Add to this list, the French thinker Cuvier, in Le Regne Animal Distribue d'apres son Organisation:

The Negro race...is marked by black complexion, crisped or woolly hair, compressed cranium and a flat nose. The projection of the lower parts of the face, and the thick lips, evidentially approximate it to the monkey tribe: the hordes of which it consists have always remained in the most complete state of barbarism.^{^[8]}

In addition, Charles Montesquieu in The Spirit of the Laws, David Hume in On National Character, Thomas Carlyle in The Nigger Question, and Joseph Gobineau in The Inequality of the Human Race, all saw the African race as animals, beasts. Edward Gibbon, author of The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, was the most direct of the group in assessing what he viewed as the innate weakness and worthlessness of Africans:

The Negroes' rude ignorance has never invented any effectual weapons of defense or destruction: they appear incapable of forming any extensive plans of government or conquest: and the obvious inferiority of their mental faculties has been discovered and abused by the nations of the temperate zone. (Gibbon Vol. III, 277)

Gibbon is correct on one point: Africans obviously have been "abused by the nations of the temperate zone" (Whites, Arabs, and other Semites). Even Karl Marx (a revolutionary thinker in European political circles), a pupil of Hegel, though critical and in some ways Hegel's antithesis in philosophy and economics, did not go unaffected by this view of the African in European historiography. In fact, his racism is in common with the legacy of White supremacy. Why else would there be an "Asiatic mode of production" in Africa, according to Marx, unless a population of Arabs invaded Africa and superimposed it on already existing ancient African modes of production?^{^[9]} Why else would he, being a materialist, subscribe to the "miraculous" developments of an indigenous "Greek Philosophy" when he knew that accurate materialist philosophy is summarized theory, and theories are summarized practice?

The facts are:

1. On the one hand, there stood African KMT with 4000 years of evident summarized material practice, and on the other hand were invading Greeks camped on Egyptian (KMT) soil in their new capitol at Alexandria. There they published theories and philosophies with Rosetta Stone's as the translation mediums for 200 years. Marx was a materialist. He demanded empirical positivist data to verify his deduction. When it came to Africa, however, his racism blinded his view of the dialectical transformation that had occurred in Africa as a result of millennia of White and Arab invasions. Why else would Marx accept, uncritically, the notion that an Aristotle, in a period that scientific experimentation and theory crept at a snails pace, wrote over 1000 books in less than 17 years on every area of science imaginable---in a time when there were no printing presses and writing was in its swaddling cloth?^{^[10]} He was no more a genius than the hundreds of Egyptian (KMT) scientific works that he, and his invading assistants translated into the Greek language.
2. Further, how could Marx write his Ph.D. dissertation on the Difference Between the Democritean and Epicurean Philosophy of Nature, summarizing what he considered all the schools of Greek Philosophy and not note that each one of these men, including Plato, Pythagoras, Euclid, Aristotle, spent the larger part of their educational lives studying in African KMT ? What were they studying? Who was teaching them? They were not in KMTic temples teaching anyone. They were there to learn. Whose body of knowledge were they drawing from? Why were they studying their science, philosophy, geometry, biology, architecture, dialectics, algebra, grammar, and logic in African KMT rather than in Greece?
3. Was it not Marx who argued that philosophy is summarized theory; theory is summarized practice; summarized practice is human material productive activity; and human productivity is based on the historical productive forces bequeathed to the population in question? Where is Greek thought before the unity with African KMT ? There are no written Greek thoughts before 900bc. Where is Greek architecture in 800bc? Where are Greek science, philosophy, religion, and civilization before the relationship with KMT? There is no Greek architecture, philosophy, religion, and civilization of significance before 800 BC. By this time KMT has over 3000 years of practical engineering and architectural experience building 40-story pyramids in Africa.

The largest ancient buildings in the world were designed, engineered, and constructed in African KMT ^{^[11]}---some of them over 40 stories high. Khufu pyramid is 146.0 meters high; Khafre pyramid is 143.5 meters high; Snefru pyramid is 105.0 meters high; MenKAure pyramid is 65.6 meters high, and Zoser pyramid is 63.0 meters high. There were over 80 large pyramid structure built in ancient African KMT. Each was mathematically accurate down to a fraction of an inch. They still stand in testimony to practical geometry, algebra, architecture and the most efficient organization of hydraulic power and human labor power in ancient history.
The Hellenic intellectual genius came to light and was developed principally outside Athens and continental Greece· in Asia Minor (Bergam, Miletus· Halicarnassus)· Palestine (Antioch) and in KMT . It was in KMT that philosophy was to know a new advance with the neo-Platonism of Plotinus. The most important library in the world of that time (which was later to be burnt by fanatical Christians) the most eminent doctors practizing dissection, engineers ~! building "modern machines" (thaumaturgists): flying pigeon in wood, steam reaction turbine· "Hero's sphere," etc., all were found in KMT and not in Athens. Why? There is no apparent reason, if it is not that the substructure and the KMT ian intellectual tradition which had already lasted thousands of years offered to scientists conditions of work with which neither the Europe nor Asia of that time could compete. Nothing gives such an idea of the inequality of the foreign contributions to Greece as this permanent choice and the development of the KMT science compared with those in other centers of Asia and Europe, to those who would like to weigh Africa and Asia equally in this respect. Thanks to the ingenuity of KMT scientists the technical progress realized in ancient times allowed the direct passage to an industrial phase by the systematic utilisation of the machine.

6. Yet, with all of this "material" evidence of the advanced nature of African KMTic civilization, even "revolutionary" Marx failed to see where the source of the "philosophical" thought matter was compiled, transmitted, translated into Greek, and then transferred to Southern Europe and later to the whole of East and West Europe. Even Marx never inquired into why much of the Hellenistic knowledge that he and other claimed for Greece was being compiled in Africa, African KMT , at a colonial possession that Europeans call Alexandria.
7. Even with the capitol of Greece being moved to African KMT , a brilliant revolutionary mind like Marx's could not see what existed directly in front of his racist nose. In a word, Greeks, in 250 years were to invent everything, but had invented nothing, according to Diop (1991, 310-333), that was not already in practical use in African KMT from 2500bc.
8. In short, even Europe's most free minds were dominated by the ideology of White supremacy. Hegel was a moderate in his assessment of the "African Question," compared to most of his contemporary European counterparts in England, the United States, France, Portugal, and Spain. He, being a historian on an imperialist's payroll, was merely summarizing, then justifying the fragments of a shattered African world. When he said that Egypt was the reference point to which thought matter was passed from Africa to Europe (he says from its Eastern to Western phase) he was unconsciously reviewing the basis of Greek Hellenism and the foundation of what later became German philosophy. This was, of course, a predatory transplantation of 4000 years of Egyptian summarized practices (theory) from Alexander in Africa to European Greece and later Rome, Western Europe, then Eastern Europe. Africa, and specifically African KMT were left to rot as a mere social, cultural, and political corpse of what it had been and could have been if it had not been for the external invasions.
9. When Hegel viewed Africa as having no history and without movement, he was objectively viewing a death phase in his dialectic (birth-death-rebirth) as it would apply to an entire population and its societies. He was looking at a dead social body that had lived and was killed and saying that it had never lived. African civilization and the whole of African culture had been shattered, decimated, destroyed so that Arabia, western Asia, and Europe might have their "Absolute Spirit."
10. From the crippling raids of Assyrians in 656bc to the "scorched earth" practices of the Persians under Cambyses (525bc) as he ordered destroyed "everything that revealed the greatness of Egypt," Africa was unceremoniously plunged into its own "Dark Age" or period of social and cultural collapse. But the death of the African societies along the Nile River was unnatural and, therefore, in no condition to be resurrected in the rebirth of African societies on a higher level.
11. As Europe went from communalism to slavery to feudalism to capitalism to socialism, Africa, on the other hand had its internal birth, death, and rebirth societal cycles crippled and ultimately decimated by external invasions form Arabs and Europeans. When the slavery-based Roman Empire fell internally and was invaded by Visigoths, Vandals, Ostrogoths and Goths (or "barbarian" Germanic tribes), White populations were invading White populations, thus, the culture would be preserved in a sublated higher social formation. Northern Europeans were invading Southern Europeans.
12. In the case of the Greek, Roman, and Arab invasions of African KMT, the external invasions at the time of its decline and fall were just the opposite. Europeans and Arabs invaded indigenous Kmt Africans now being called Egyptians by the invaders; thus, only a destructive negation could and did result. This is important. There was no sublation, or rebirth, of African culture in a higher society.
13. Similar to the invasions of Rome by the "barbarian" Germanic tribes, the military force brought against Africans was also savage and barbarian. If Germanic tribes who invaded Rome (410ad-500ad) were barbarians, as all of European history describes them, so too were the Greeks, Macedonians, and Romans who invaded African KMT (332bc-30BC).
14. They too were invading an advanced civilization, a civilization based on 4000 years of practical experience, which was more advanced in the arts and the sciences than the whole of Western, Eastern, Southern or Northern Europe. But, African KMT , too, had rotted internally thus leaving them prey for any external military invasions.

Hegel, and later the entire white educational system had freeze-framed Europeans in Greece after the invasions, after all of the cultural, social, economic, scientific, intellectual, and material loot had been garnered and translated using Rosetta Stone's and human translators. In the 19th century, Hegel was looking at Africa and Africans after over two thousand years of direct colonization, enslavement, and decimation due to European and Arab predatory invasions. From this he was saying that things have always been this way for them and for us. Whites, therefore, in his and Marx's view had always been superior intellectually, and Africans had always been inferior. Even though the factual empirical evidence indicated otherwise, these and other European philosophers firmly adhered to what Bernal in Black Athena called the Aryan model, or the fabrication of ancient and modern White intellectual superiority.

As the Arab invasions, beginning in 621ad, were made easy by the earlier devastation caused by Rome and Greece, the Northern European invasions were prepared as a result of the decimation caused by the Arabs. In Africa, for generations people regressed as parasitic invaders and interlopers progressed at their expense. They reached a point of social retrogression such that they could not adequately defend themselves against any invader. Next came European 15^th century feudalist imperialism, capitalist enslavement, colonization, and neo-colonization---all in an evolutionary order after each prior form of parasitism had outlived its economic usefulness to Europe.

Summary

In sum, every struggle on the part of Africans had been an antithesis to European predatory struggles to benefit at their expense. Until 500ad, England, most of France, Germany, and most of Northern Europe had no part, as Hegel would have to admit, in what he and others defined as "civilized" history. To be objective in his study of Africa and Europe, Hegel would also have to compare Ancient Greece and Rome to Germanic tribes in 200ad when he speaks of European "Western Civilization," which none of the people who looked like and talked like him had any knowledge of.

He would have to take a look at the White Huns, Angels, Saxons, Jute, Suevi, and Alans in the 5th century BC and ask himself why were they living at the entrance of "savagery" (based on his definition of Africans). They were barbarians as all European history textbooks make explicit, even today. If they could be restored to life in a rebirth of Roman and Grecian cultural principles and practices, why could not Africans go through the same dialectic? Or did the dialectic only apply to White populations?

In substance, Hegel and other Europeans were looking at a population of black-skinned people, Africans, that they and their ancestors had a direct hand in decimating, re-tribalizing, de-civilizing, and de-humanizing. For seven centuries, the black Egyptian (KMT) population that remained in that Nile Valley region was overwhelmed in an unprecedented fashion by hordes of invading Whites and Semites. African civilization was shattered, gutted. In the dialectic between first and last, the last (Whites) had become first and the first (Africans) had become last. That process was completed with the 1884-85 Berlin Conference in which the entire African continent was divided piecemeal to any European who could get an invitation to the meeting. In a 20-year period of "first come-first serve" almost an entire continent was torn up and parceled out by Whites.

From the period of ancient Greek colonization as witnessed and documented by eyewitnesses to the most significant individuals in ancient Greek history, that is, Greek Tragedies (Aischylos' The Suppliants, The Egyptians, The Danaids, Amymone, and Homer's, Odyssey; Herodotus' Histories),^{^[12]}and the Phoenicians, Pelasgians, Ionians, Herodotus, Plato, Aristotle, Alexander, Thucydides, Solon, Pythagoras, Lykourgos, Diodorus, and others, it was common knowledge in ancient times that Greece imported the ideological raw material (thought matter)---both mystical and scientific---from a decomposing Egyptian (KMT) society, which was 4000 years its senior. "Egypt, even conquered, remained the venerable home of the sciences that she had kept secret for millennia. Now, the barbarians had broken through the doors of her sanctuaries; she is conquered and will become by force the teacher of young nations, of the Greeks in particular: the Greeks miracle" will begin, as a consequences of the occupation of Egypt by the foreigner, Greek in particular, and therefore of the forced access to the scientific treasures of Egypt, of the plundering of the temple libraries and of their submission of the priests."^{^[13]}

In 332bc, when the invading White Greeks marched into Africa, they merely took advantage of a favorable situation to garner in capsule form a philosophical basis,^{^[14]} when there were, of course, no copyright laws. They imported ready-made scientific knowledge. They did not produce science in Alexandria; they translated and transferred it. Alexandria in North Africa (KMT territory) became the base for transference of African knowledge to Europe. This occurred at a time when all other ---invaders, the Assyrians, Persians, in particular--- sensed, as vultures, the decay and decomposition of a dying African KMT society which was moving into a "Dark Age".

By 900bc, African KMT feudalism was decomposing. It was in the process of a "Dark Age" similar to the one that Rome had nearly 1000 years later. It was in the process of internal decay as an African society when external invading European populations, which were at a lesser stage of social relations, attacked it and took it over. Whereas Rome was overrun by other northern White populations, African KMT was raided and pillaged not by other African ethnic groups but by outsiders. The internal dialectic of the evolution of indigenous societies in Africa was destroyed, similar to the external destruction of the Aztec, and Incas societies in Central and South America.

With (1) ideal conditions, (2) proper means of destruction, and (3) thousands of mercenary conquistadors, Egypt (KMT) was quickly pillaged and colonized by Assyrians, Persians, Macedonians, Greeks, Romans and, today, Arabs. As a result, each invading population busily picked through the rubble of this once proud and long-developing spiral of African KMT societies.

The series of indigenous African societies was broken. However, it was only Macedonians and Greeks who had sufficient enough insight to extract that which would transcend time barriers and spiral in value and practical application as generations passed: kernels of scientific knowledge. They were but an intermediary, a transmitter of thought-matter. The fraudulent Greek "miracle" of genius must be seen for what it is: plagiarism on a societal level^{^[15]} with Alexandria being a significant staging point, storage warehouse for stolen documents, and a transference center where African KMT and other subjugated peoples were forced to teach their murderous White colonizers everything that they knew.

Essentially, a transplantation^{^[16]} of the 4000 years of accumulated social consciousness, "the social brain" of a dying series of African KMTic societies took place, spanning the period 600bc-50bc.^{^[17]} Greece collected all of the "intellectual " loot of North Africa, Southwest Asia, and India. Alexandria became the base for the storage and translation of these documents into the Greek language. The invaders would have had, first of all, to recollect materials for these sciences to work upon, again. A certain amount of natural and historical material must be collected before there can be any critical analysis, comparison, and arrangement in classes, orders, and species. The Black Africans in KMT, therefore, first worked out the foundations of the exact natural sciences 2500 years before Greece, Rome, and later European and Arab metaphysicians seized the torch of scientific extradition.

The analysis of the universe into its individual parts; the mastery of astrophysics, physics, chemistry, biology, psychology, anthropology, archaeology, geology, and mathematics; the grouping of the different natural processes and objects in definite classes; the study of the internal anatomy of organized bodies in their manifold forms; the classification of societies, their stages of development and other aspects---these are the fundamental conditions of the gigantic strides that modern Africans must make if African-centered theory is to build on what the ancient Africans of KMT have bequeathed the Black race. In short, Greeks were not producing scientific theories---they were merely translating into Greek those documented theories that came as a result of colonial conquest in Africa and Southwest Asia.

By the time Rome took over from Greece, there was not much of anything scientific left to transfer from African KMT , only grain and fruits, labor power in the form of slaves, and the religious aroma (or stench) of a thoroughly raped and subjugated culture were left. They had stolen everything that could be transported back to Rome and destroyed that which they could not understand. Invading Arabs would later throw out the Romans, (circa. 641ad), and rule, ignorant of the past history of North Africa, in much the same way as European invaders of North America claimed all things of world cultural significance as their own.

From the very beginning of its civilization, the indigenous Black population of KMT was dualistic cosmologically and philosophically in art, writing, aesthetics and every day cultural life. The art is materially vivid in expressing this union of opposites, particularly those in the tombs of pharaohs, queens, engineers, judges, teachers, priests, scribes, and noblemen of all periods. In this mode of thought, everything in life is interrelated and exists within a continuum of natural birth, death, and rebirth in some new form or content.

This system of thought synthesized this reality within an all-embracing process of evolutionary and devolutionary patterns, which are continually being repeated, but never under the same exact conditions, and never with the same exact results. Instead of a circle-based process, KMT saw development and change as a reincarnating spiral of material and spiritual events. This is African civilization at its best, at its beginning, at its highest, at its morally soundest, in its purest most fluid form---a form uncontaminated by later invading Whites and Arabs. Certain tableaux, such as those of war, farming, wine-making, fishing, or the paintings of men and women of the upper classes as they hunt game, or of temple construction and other crafts, give a virtual multidimensional expression of the essential fluid, movements, self-impressions, and gesture of the behavior depicted.

This expression of thought and art was able to organize the essence of a natural action, depict the process, show its unities and its opposites, use the natural surroundings as a symbolic basis of mental abstractions, and summarize the phenomena in words, picture-drawings, painting, monuments, statue or temple by means of a few generative principles.

^{^[1]}Georg W. F. Hegel, The Philosophy of History, Dover Publications: New York, 1956, pp. 90-92

^{^[2]}Ibid., p. 93.

^{^[3]}Ibid., p. 95.

^{^[4]}Ibid., p. 98.

^{^[5]}Ibid., p. 98.

^{^[6]}Ibid., p. 99.

^{^[7]}J.A., de Gobineau, Oeuvres, Vol. 1. Paris: Pleiades, 1983, pp., 340-341.

^{^[8]}G. Cuvier, Le Regne Animal Distribue d'apres son Organisation, Paris, trans M. MacMurtrie, 1831, as The Animal Kingdom, 4 vols, New York, vol. 1, p.53.

^{^[9]}Even today modern Marxist social scientist see nothing wrong in categorizing the Nile River based hydraulic modes of production as Asiatic Modes of Production. Asian cultural, and productive developments around river systems are in no way comparable to African cultural and productive development around the Nile. Egypt has nothing of significance in cultural, social, architectural, religious, and linguistic commonality with Mesopotamia, Persia, or Assyria. Yet, clearly an African mode of production which flowed out of the interior of Africa has to become a Asiatic outpost. Interesting.

^{^[10]}See R.A. Schwaller De Lubicz, Sacred Science, Inner Traditions International : New York, 1982, for a comprehensive discussion of the level of science in African KMT over 2000 years before Greece, and Rome came into existence.

^{^[11]}